FGN AND AMNESTY GRADUATES: WHERE ARE THE JOBS?
The Nigerian oil sector has been
the bread winner of the Nigerian national economy following the abysmal decline
in the agricultural sector and near extinction of the manufacturing sector. It
contributes more than half of the total amount of Nigerians’ national income.
Other sectors of the economy are either undeveloped, underdeveloped or
‘confused’ due to total ignorance, abandonment, negligence and declining
investments thus contributing little or nothing to the nation’s gross domestic
product (GDP). Operating a mono-economy, with little but failing efforts at
diversification has created a rift between the oil producing states and the
non-oil producing states of the country. Agitations for resource ownership and
control by the oil-producing states have heightened tensions and its
consequences over some decades now.
The increasing activities of
multi-national and trans-national oil companies in the oil-rich region have
left it with severe social, economic and environmental challenges. Most of the
communities and people living within areas of oil exploration, extraction and
refining have lost their means of livelihood with little or no alternatives.
And this has given birth to many group of activists and militants in the
region. The activities of MEND, a supposed umbrella body of all forms of
activism in the region, are widely heard and known; and the presence of militia
groups across the Niger Delta Region is well recognized.
The social, economic and
infrastructural development of the oil-rich region is being on the decline
despite its huge contributions to national economic growth and development.
These do not mean that there were no attempts to invest in the development of
the region. It may be that such attempts at developing the region were not well
conceived, coordinated and articulated and were fraught with corruption.
Being faced with a declining oil
production and loss of oil revenues due to oil theft, kidnapping, militancy and
youth restiveness in the region, both the oil companies and the federal
government, made concerted efforts to address the critical issues of
environmental degradation, loss of economic opportunities, poor and inadequate
infrastructures, etc being faced by the communities, people and the entire
region. These led to the creation of the Niger Delta Development Commission
(NDDC) and the Federal Ministry of Niger Delta by the present democratic
government. Shells, Chevron and other multi-national oil companies in the
country also took steps to engage the services of experts through their
corporate social responsibility plans to increase their social investment in
communities affected by their activities.
Today, the present government is
investing a substantial amount of money in an on-going Amnesty Programme which
includes capacity building through education and training in various skills for
“ex-militants” coupled with a sort of social welfare payment after an initial
disarmament exercise. Over 30,000 men and women are expected to undergo various
trainings of their own choices under the proposed plan.
Since the introduction of the
Amnesty programme, there has been a decline in the level of militancy and a
return of relative peace in the region.
Besides the Amnesty programme is
an Infrastructural Development Road Map Plan for the entire oil-rich region.
But none seems to be happening with regards to the “Development Road Map”.
We should remember that the rise
of activism, militancy and youth restiveness in the Niger Delta region were the
results of the gross underdevelopment experienced by the communities and people
since the commencement of oil exploration and extraction in the region.
Activism and militancy in this oil-rich region were only symptoms of the
problem mentioned above. Addressing the symptoms in expense of the actual problem
of underdevelopment suffered by the communities and people will amount to a
waste of precious time and scarce resources. Equal or more attention and
resources—human and materials—should be committed to the infrastructural and
economic development of the region to avoid a possible recurrence of militancy
and youth restiveness in the region at the end of the programe in 2015.
Treading the development of the region for the Amnesty programme (that is,
“tokenism”) will spell doom in the nearest future.
But, my concern is the fact that
we now have a growing army of “graduates” from the various skills acquisition
centers and educational institutions within and outside the country. Recently,
over 200 youths have been trained and certified as pilots from reputable
training institutions outside the country. And there are many others that have
acquired professional skills and qualifications in different trades and
disciplines since the beginning of the Amnesty programme. But what modality is
in place to absorb this growing army of young graduates?
What is the state of the
economies of the oil-rich states? What is the level of economic activities in
the individual states? Are the states prepared to accommodate these young
graduates? This is a concern that must be shared by the federal government and
the states given the increasing number of youth unemployment in the country
especially among young graduates. The recent protest by unemployed youths in
Bayelsa State is an indication that the Niger Delta states may experience a new
dimension of youth restiveness if the issue of youth unemployment is not taken
seriously given the surge in the supply of graduates from the Amnesty
programme.
I am convinced that most of the
education and training offered to youths under the Amnesty programme are to
make them ‘wage-takers’ rather than ‘wage-providers’: a welfare kind of
education and training which support passive rather than active approach to
potential or actual unemployment. For those that are expected to become self-employed
by reason of their education and training, there is a possibility that less
than 20 percent of these individuals will become self-employed, and less than
10 percent will remain self-employed three years after graduation. The simple
reason is because they are being pushed into self-employment instead of being
pulled. And any supposed entrepreneurship training with self-employment as an
outcome will only lead to “necessity entrepreneurship”.
In order to stimulate and create
economic activities and opportunities in the oil-rich Niger Delta states and
the country at large, I would like to suggest that a National Entrepreneurship
Policy and Strategy be initiated by the governments. And this should be
followed by a National Entrepreneurship Education Strategy. A National Office
for Innovation and Entrepreneurship should be created to coordinate and promote
the development of entrepreneurship in the country. This will drive economic
growth, job creation and the development of a vibrant formal small- and medium-sized
(SME) business sector. It may also improve and strengthen the nation’s global
competitiveness. A Presidential Taskforce on Entrepreneurship Education should
be constituted to promote entrepreneurship education in all types/levels of
education in the country. Both the National and State Assemblies should enact
laws to cater to the development of high-growth small businesses, and to
encourage innovations in medium and large local enterprises. The state
governments should set up offices of entrepreneurship policies to make and
coordinate policies that will create a conducive business environment for
micro-, small- and large-scale enterprises (MSMEs) to thrive.
In conclusion, the Amnesty
Programme is being so far very successful given the increase in the production
of oil and the return of relative peace to the region. There has also been an
increase in revenue accruing to the government from the sales of oil in the
oil-rich states. However, it is important for the governments to initiate
strategies and policies capable of generating the much needed economic
opportunities thus creating more jobs for young graduates from the Amnesty
Programme and higher-education institutions in the region and the country at
large. The integration of entrepreneurship education into all types/levels of
school programmes in the country will provide graduates with job options.
The federal, state and local
governments should not forget to address the various and peculiar challenges
faced by the communities and people. Neglecting the issues of development faced
by the communities and the people which have far reaching impacts on the entire
region than the Amnesty Programme will erase the gains realized so far since
the commencement of the Amnesty programme.
Comments
Post a Comment